In this lecture Dave started off by discussing books and he gave us an example of how he draws information from it. For example he wanted to look up semiology and the part in the book was about Roland Barthes.
From there we went on to talk about Paris Match. Paris Match is a French magazine. Dave discussed semiology and Roland Barthes. Barthes was always thinking photographically. Barthes saw the front cover of Paris Match and there on the front cover was a picture of a French African boy saluting a flag. During this time Barthes was writing his mythologies. What Barthes did was apply connotation and denotation to critically discuss images. In the book mythologies Barthes basically said its much more complicated than using connotation and denotation. Barthes comes up with this myth idea and this connects with critical reflection and trying to dig deep into photography.
Judith Williamson who wrote Decoding Advertising refers to a similar thing and she says reference systems. What Barthes may be trying to say with Myth is we can look at an image of an advert but it doesn’t explain the ideological system where that sits within. It doesn’t explain how we live our lives in a western society. If we grow up in a ideological society we won’t necessarily be able to identify or see because we have grow up in it.
Barthes went on to say if you then add another layer onto this like connotation and denotation you will be able to dig deeper and get more from the decoding of the image.
What I learned from this lecture is that I shouldn’t find myself reading the same books because I could find key examples of what I want to discuss in books such as Mythologies.
We then talked about putting a gam chart in place for our critical reflection or a system that works for me. We should set aside small parts of our time to do about 15 to 20 mins a day reading and taking notes on what I have read.
Dave mention that he was struggling with tying down a certain aspect of his practice. I understand exactly what he means. As this point of this project I am finding it difficult to pin down a area of portraiture.
Notes I made from this essay that helped me were; Keep the idea for the essay simple for example comparing an adverting portrait today with an portrait advertisement for the 1950s. This got me thinking of something that I have always had an interest in which is cinematography. I have always watched movies and thought I would like to use a narrative in my images. Now that I am applying theory to my photography I would like to combine to two. Last night I practiced this. I took a picture in my house. I have attached the image below.
What I was trying to do in this image was use the reflections on the wall to create a dreamy scene within the image. I was thinking of what is real and not real in the approach of this self portrait. What I see in the image is a wall that has shadows cast onto it. I have place myself off to the right of the image so my shadow would be projected onto the wall.
Earlier in Daves lecture I recall the part about Barthes and using Myth and connotation and denotation to critically discuss images. I would like to know what smoe like Barthes thought of this image because to me obviously it means something, nothing to deep, I was simply thinking of what is real and not real. Funny enough the reality to me in the image is the shadows. Those shadows were on that wall before I got there. I then constructed myself into the image and did a odd pose. In saying that because my shadow is now on the wall does that become part of the reality?
During this lesson we were shown the medium format camera and the basics of how it works. The reason for this is was to demonstrate the different ways we can use the equipment for experimental practice. I will use the medium format camera as I am interested in using a different medium of shooting my images.